Preparation and Capturing of Tardigrades From Organic Samples  

Luke Potter

University of Rochester
Institute of Optics

OPT307: Practical Electron Microscopy
Spring 2021

Final Project


Introduction

  1. Tardigrades
  2. Scanning Electron Microscopy
Methods and Results
  1. Obtaining Samples
  2. Hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS)
  3. Stereoscope and Mounting
  4. Sputter Coating
  5. Secondary Electron Imaging, SEM
  6. Micrograph Processing
  7. Colorization

End Remarks

  1. Discussion and Conclusion
  2. Acknowledgements
  3. References
  4. Comments


 

Introduction

 

1. Tardigrades

Tardigrades are a vast and versatile type of tiny invertebrate. They are commonly referred to by other names such as water bear or moss piglet because of their round shape.Tardigrades usually have a long cylindrical body with eight legs that have claws and a mouth to feed. Depending on the species they can be herbivores or carnivores and live in many different environments. Their reslience is shown by their ability to survive in extreme environments like the vacuum of space, high radiation, extreme temperatures, and many other situations.This can be attributed to the two states Tardigrades exist in, similar to responsive hibernation; their active states and their Tun state. Their Tun state is used when there is not enough water to move properly and in response reduces their metabolism down to 0.01 percent of the normal rate. This allows them survive up to decades until they are in a better environment. [1]

 2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Tardigrades are able to be viewed through light microscopes since their maximum size is around 0.5 mm but this type of imaging does not show their surface structure as well. Using Scanning Electron Microscopy, we can see the fine details of their surface structures, such as their claws and head structure. [2].




 

Methods and Results

 

1. Obtaining Samples

To get tardigrades ready for sample preparation moss was collected from around the Riverview Student Housing. The moss was then soaked in water for at least 4 hours then brought into the lab to find the tardigrades. Using a stereoscope tardigrades were then plucked from the sample into a vial that will be used to dry them out through HMDS.

Figure 1: Within the cups are peices of moss that contain the tardigrades.

 

2.HMDS Drying

To get the tardigrades ready for Hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) drying they were first put into a solution with Glutaraldehyde to harden their cellular membrane. After the fixation process the specimens were then dehydrated by steadily increasing the level of ethanol in the solution. Once the ethanol solution is at 100 percent the solution is then switched to a Hexamethyldisilazane solution and the sample is air dried after being submerged in that solution for at least an hour.

 

3. Stereoscope and Mounting

Once the HMDS drying was complete the tardigrades needed to be mounted on the SEM stubs. To do this a stereoscope, sharpened wooden stick, and tweezers were needed. The samples were taken out of the vial and put on a dark surface for better contrast. Then using the stereoscope the samples were picked up using either the tip of the wood or edge of the tweezers. Two stubs used conductive paint to mount the samples while two other stubs used double sided tape to mount the samples. The change occured due to the trouble that I experiances while trying to mount the specimines using conductive paint. With the conductive paint another sharpened wooden dowel was used to apply the paint. The sample needed to be quickly put on the stub as to not let the paint dry before the sample was securly attached.

 

Figure 2: The stereoscope being used to find tardigrades before the HMDS Drying. This stereoscope is also used during the mounting process.

 

4. Sputter Coating

The samples were sputter coated for a total of 190 seconds at 20 mA. Sputter coating is when the samples are inserted into a chamber and the air is transitioned to Argon gas. When the chamber is filled with Argon, a charge is sent through the argon vaporizing gold that is positioned above the samples. This gold floats down and forms islands on the surface of the samples. These islands connect and form a path for the sample to ground better. The stubs that used conductive paint were coated three times with the first coat being 100 seconds, the second coat being 40 seconds, and the third coat being 50 seconds. This was done since the sample was experiencing a lot of charging in the SEM. The other two stubs were coated for 190 seconds to begin with since those stubs were made after the other stubs needed to be coated multiple times.

 

 

5.Secondary Electron Imaging

After the samples were prepared the stubs were placed on the sample holder for the SEM and inserted into the SEM chamber. The samples were imaged using the secondary electron imaging technique. This was used because I wanted to obtain surface information for the sample and did not need information from materials. Using other forms of imaging such as Backscatter Detection would reduce the resolution of the micrograph and there was no benefit since Tardigrades are mostly carbon and not atomically diverse species.

 

Figure 3: [Top Left] An unedited mircograph of some small creature. Unsure of if this is a tardigrade or not. [Top Middle] This is an unedited micrograph of a tardigrade. [Top Right] A close up shot of the Tardigrade. [Bottom Left] A close-up microgaph of the claws of the tardigrade. [Bottom Right] A micrograph of some moss that the tardigrades came from.

 

6. Mircograph Image Modifiaction

After the Micrographs were produced I decided to modify some of them to produce better looking micrographs that will be used later for colorization. I chose to modify them using ImageJ since the imformation from the micrograph did not need to be kept the same, but I needed to make sure that the modified micrograph did not deviate from the original by much.

Figure 4: [Top Left] The edited micrograph of the tardigrade. [Top Middle] The edited micrograph of the possible tardigrade. [Top Right] The edited micrograph of the tardigrades claws. [Center Left] The edited micrograph of the posible tardigrade's face. [Center Middle] Edited micrograph of possible tardigrades surface structure. This structure also has bacteria on it. [Middle Right] An edited microgaph of a close up shot of the structure in the Center Middle Micrograph. [Bottom Left] An edited close up image of the tardigrade's face. [Bottom Right] An edited micrograph of a tardigrade on its side.

 

7. Colorization

With the modified micrographs I then used Photoshop to overlay color onto them. This was to better depict the differences between the Tardigrades and the background. It is important to note that these micrographs were colorized post capture and that an SEM is unable to produce colorized micrographs.

Figure 5: [Top Left] Tardigrade Colorized. [Top Left] Colorized Strucutures of the possible tardigrade. [Top Right] Colorized Micrograph of the possible tardigrade. [Bottom Left] Tardigrades Claws Colorized. [Bottom Right] a fun colorization of the structures from the possible tardigrades.

 


 

 

END REMARKS

 

1. Discussion and Conclusion

The purpose of this final project was originally to produce micrographs of Tardigrades in both their active and Tun states. This proved to be difficult given how small they were and how they needed to be prepared. When using the Stereoscope to identify the tardigrades there was trouble finding them since they were semi-transparent in visible wavelengths. After HMDS drying, mounting also proved extremely difficult. Due to their small size and being dry, tardigrades are easily susceptible to static charges and being flung by small forces. When picking them up my hands had to be extremely steady or the tardigrades would be lost in the preparation lab.

I also found that the samples were charging a lot more than I was expecting. Even with the large layer of gold deposited on them from the sputter coating the SEMs aperture needed to be closed down to 10 microns and the raster time needed to be decreased to help with the charging effects. The micrographs were taken with an integration function where the raster speeds were fast resulting in little detail, but the micrograph took 50-94 of these rasters to produce a detailed micrograph at the end.

During this project I was able to obtain micrographs of tardigrades. I was unable to capture them in the two states they live in, but I was able to capture them in a state where they are inbetween the two. In the future to have greater chance of obtaining samples in the active and tun state there will need to be changes in how the samples are dried and mounted. I beleive that the resons that I was unable to get the micrographs needed was due to having as much trouble mounting samples as I did.

 

2. Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Biran McIntyre for his help and guidance in this class. He was able to provide crucial experience that really helped when I faced problems like the charging and mounting. I would also like to thank Georgios Atsidaftis for giving me the inspiration behind this project.

 

3. References

[1]Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Tardigrade". Encyclopedia Britannica, 18 Sep. 2020, https://www.britannica.com/animal/tardigrade. Accessed 1 May 2021.

[2]https://microcosmos.foldscope.com/?p=17901


 

Comments

 

Please enter any comments, criticisms, questions, etc. below.

Your name:

Email address: